RAD-140
Showing all 10 results
Showing all 10 results
What rad 140 uk buyers are actually looking at
RAD-140, or testolone, carries the strongest anabolic claim of anything in the SARMs range. This section holds 10 lines from £67 to £210, averaging around £111 — the most expensive SARM stocked here.
The claim is not baseless. In animal work RAD-140 produced anabolic effects comparable to testosterone at far lower doses, with less prostate stimulation. That is the finding the entire category is built on.
The word “selective” is doing a lot of work
The premise of a selective androgen receptor modulator is tissue selectivity: muscle and bone get the anabolic signal, prostate and skin largely do not. Selectivity is relative, not absolute, and it degrades as the dose rises.
RAD-140 suppresses natural testosterone production. Users report suppression at ordinary doses, and it is not a mild effect that resolves in a week. Anyone treating a SARM as a way to build muscle without touching the endocrine system has misread what these compounds do.
What the evidence covers, and what it does not
| Source | What it shows |
|---|---|
| Animal studies | Anabolic effect, reduced prostate stimulation |
| Early human trials | Conducted in breast cancer, not in healthy athletes |
| Long-term safety | Not established in any population |
The gap in that table is the point. RAD-140 has never completed development for any indication, so nobody has a controlled picture of what it does over months in a healthy person taking it for physique reasons.
Liver markers deserve attention
Case reports of drug-induced liver injury associated with RAD-140 exist in the published literature. They are individual reports rather than a measured incidence rate, so the honest statement is that the risk is documented but unquantified — which is not the same as small.
Baseline and follow-up liver panels are the sensible response, and they cost very little against what they detect.
Where it sits against the alternatives
Against ostarine, RAD-140 is stronger and more suppressive. Against an oral steroid, the honest comparison is that it is not obviously safer — it is less studied, which is a different thing that often gets presented as the same thing.
Anyone who will need post cycle therapy afterwards should plan it before starting, not after bloodwork comes back.
Legal and testing status
RAD-140 is not licensed as a medicine in the UK. It is sold for research purposes and is prohibited in sport at all times under the WADA list. Tested athletes should treat it as a positive test waiting to happen. Nothing here is medical advice. Verification guidance is in how to check a brand is genuine.
Dosing folklore versus dosing data
The dose ranges that circulate for RAD-140 were not established by anyone. They emerged from forum consensus and were repeated until they acquired the appearance of authority. No dose-ranging study in healthy people exists to support them, which is worth knowing before treating a number as validated.
Frequently asked questions
Is RAD-140 suppressive?
Yes, at ordinary doses. Treat it as suppressive by default rather than hoping otherwise.
Is it safer than an oral steroid?
It is less studied, which is not the same as safer. Liver injury case reports exist for RAD-140.
Why is it the most expensive SARM here?
Synthesis cost and demand. Price does not indicate potency across different compounds.
Will it show on a drugs test?
Yes. It is prohibited at all times in tested sport and detectable.
Does it need PCT?
Assume so. Plan it before starting, since suppression is the expected outcome rather than the exception.
